Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14356/1066
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSubedi, Nuwadatta-
dc.contributor.authorMallik, Mukesh-
dc.contributor.authorChaudhary, Roshan Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorGurung, Gita-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-21T06:08:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-21T06:08:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationSubediN., MallikM., ChaudharyR. K., & GurungG. (2021). Age Estimation from Attrition of Permanent Molars. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 19(1), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v19i1.3397en_US
dc.identifier.issnPrint ISSN: 1727-5482; Online ISSN: 1999-6217-
dc.identifier.urihttp://103.69.126.140:8080/handle/20.500.14356/1066-
dc.descriptionOriginal Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: The average stage of attrition in permanent first and second molars is an established method of age estimation in the adult population. The study was conducted with an objective of age estimation from the average stage of attrition of permanent molars. Methods: A total of 451 individuals of age more than 20 years were examined. Nepalese individuals with intact first and second permanent molars in the maxillary and mandibular arch on either side were included. The average stage of attrition of the maxillary first and second permanent molars on either side was calculated and subjected to regression analysis to derive equations. Results: Among a total of 451 participants, 231 (51.22%) were females and 220 (48.78%) males, with a mean age of 44.3 ± 13.9 years. There was a strong correlation between age and average stage of attrition of molars. The correlation was stronger for upper molars compared to the lowers. Additionally, the mean of the difference between real age and estimated age was lower for maxillary compared to mandibular molars. Compared to age estimation by univariable regression, multivariable regression had greater accuracy. Similarly, estimation of age from maxillary molars was more accurate as compared to mandibular (difference in years: 3.82 ± 3.03 for maxillary molars and 5.17 ± 4.2 for mandibular molars). Conclusions: Maxillary teeth are better for age estimation and using both maxillary first and second permanent molars gives better accuracy. Keywords: Age estimation by teeth; age reporting; forensic anthropology; forensic dentistry; tooth attritionen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNepal Health Research Councilen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJan-March, 2021;3397-
dc.subjectAge estimation by teethen_US
dc.subjectage reportingen_US
dc.subjectforensic anthropologyen_US
dc.subjectforensic dentistryen_US
dc.subjecttooth attritionen_US
dc.titleAge Estimation from Attrition of Permanent Molarsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
local.journal.categoryOriginal Article-
Appears in Collections:Vol. 19 No. 1 (2021): Vol. 19 No. 1 Issue 50 Jan-Mar 2021

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
3397-Manuscript-21558-1-10-20210425.pdfFulltext Download484.15 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.