Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14356/1286
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJaiswal, Bisekha-
dc.contributor.authorTimalsina, Laxmi-
dc.contributor.authorKarki, Sushmita-
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Sanjit-
dc.contributor.authorKoirala, Surakshya-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-04T08:13:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-04T08:13:30Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationJaiswalB., TimalsinaL., KarkiS., ShresthaS., & KoiralaS. (2020). Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Tigecycline on Acinetobacter in Burn Patients. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 18(3), 431-435. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v18i3.2530en_US
dc.identifier.issnPrint ISSN: 1727-5482; Online ISSN: 1999-6217-
dc.identifier.urihttp://103.69.126.140:8080/handle/20.500.14356/1286-
dc.descriptionOriginal Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: Burn infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in spite of significant improvements in burn care and treatment. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., Staphylococcus aureus etc. are the commonest isolates in which rapid development of resistance to multiple drugs limits the therapeutic options for infections by Acinetobacter species. Hence, this study was done to find the occurrence of Acinetobacter and to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of tigecycline against Acinetobacter isolates. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Phect-Nepal Hospital, Kirtipur, Nepal from September to December 2018. Total 205 samples were included for the isolation and identification of Acinetobacter and further minimum inhibitory concentration of isolates were done following the standard laboratory protocol. Collected data were analyzed by SPSS version 23.0. Results: Among 155 culture positive samples, 27 isolates were Acinetobacter spp. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test revealed that 24 isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone and ceftazidime, but all isolates were susceptible to polymyxin B. For tigecycline, 19 isolates were resistant through dis diffusion test while 20 isolates cross the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration value from E test. The reliability of the E-test and disc diffusion was 0.920, which represent strong agreement between E- test and dis diffusion test. Conclusions: Tigecycline resistance is presenting as serious problem to the management of infection caused by Acinetobacter species. Therefore, minimum inhibitory concentration for the detection of resistance should be included in routine laboratory diagnosis. Keywords: Acinetobacter spp.; AST; burn; MIC; tigecyclineen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNepal Health Research Councilen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJul-Sep 2020;-
dc.subjectAcinetobacter sppen_US
dc.subjectASTen_US
dc.subjectBurnen_US
dc.subjectMICen_US
dc.subjectTigecyclineen_US
dc.titleMinimum Inhibitory Concentration of Tigecycline on Acinetobacter in Burn Patientsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
local.journal.categoryOriginal Article-
Appears in Collections:Vol. 18 No. 3 (2020): Vol. 18 No. 3 Issue 48 Jul-Sep 2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2530-Manuscript-18837-1-10-20201115.pdfFulltext Article.699.61 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.