Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14356/1506
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGhimire, Namita-
dc.contributor.authorVaidya, Anju-
dc.contributor.authorSah, Anil Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorKarakheti, Ashwin-
dc.contributor.authorRana, Krishna-
dc.contributor.authorMalla, Pragya-
dc.contributor.authorGyanwali, Pradip-
dc.contributor.authorJha, Anjani Kumar-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-14T10:23:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-14T10:23:54Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationGhimireN., VaidyaA., SahA. K., KarakhetiA., RanaK., MallaP., GyanwaliP., & JhaA. K. (2021). Trend and Patterns of Research Proposals Submitted for Ethical Review in Nepal Health Research Council. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 18(4), 714-718. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v18i4.3110en_US
dc.identifier.issnPrint ISSN: 1727-5482; Online ISSN: 1999-6217-
dc.identifier.urihttp://103.69.126.140:8080/handle/20.500.14356/1506-
dc.descriptionOriginal Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: The characteristics of research proposals submitted to the Nepal Health Research Council reflect the trend of health-related researches being conducted in Nepal. The objective of the study was to analyze research proposals submitted for the ethical review in Nepal Health Research Council from 2017 to 2019. Methods: A retrospective record review of research proposals received over three years from 2017 to 2019 were analyzed. A total of 2,305 research proposals was included in the study. The number of research studies per year, types of study design, priority area of research, and rejected proposal were the intended variables for the study. Results: 91.45% (503), 92.19% (748), and 755 (80.1%) of received proposals were approved from Ethical Review Board in 2017, 2018 and 2019. The number of research proposals increased every year (550 in 2017, 812 in 2018, and 943 in 2019). Among the approved proposals non-communicable disease (n=150;15.90%) in 2019} was the topmost prioritized area in all three years followed by reproductive health [93 (9.86%) in 2019] and communicable disease [67 (7.10%) in 2019] respectively. Quantitative research was more than two-third in all the years. Among the approved proposals, more than half were for an academic purpose [ 610 (64.69%)]. The reason for the rejection of the proposal was the conduction of research before ethical approval [2 (0.36%) in 2017, 2 (0.25%) in 2018, and none in 2019]. Conclusions: There was a rising trend of research proposals for ethical clearance being submitted to the Nepal Health Research Council. Research related to non-communicable disease followed by reproductive health was the commonest one. Keywords: Ethical approval; ethical review board; research proposals; record reviewen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNepal Health Research Councilen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOct-Dec, 2020;3110-
dc.subjectEthical approvalen_US
dc.subjectEthical review boarden_US
dc.subjectResearch proposalsen_US
dc.subjectRecord reviewen_US
dc.titleTrend and Patterns of Research Proposals Submitted for Ethical Review in Nepal Health Research Councilen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
local.journal.categoryOriginal Article-
Appears in Collections:Vol. 18 No. 4 (2020): Vol. 18 No. 4 Issue 49 Oct-Dec 2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
3110-Manuscript-20006-1-10-20210122.pdfFulltext Download205.3 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.