Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14356/1698
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThapa, S S-
dc.contributor.authorLakhey, R B-
dc.contributor.authorSharma, P-
dc.contributor.authorPokhrel, R K-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-19T05:01:58Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-19T05:01:58Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationThapaS. S., LakheyR. B., SharmaP., & PokhrelR. K. (2016). Correlation between Clinical Features and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Lumbar Disc Prolapse. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v14i2.794en_US
dc.identifier.issnPrint ISSN: 1727-5482; Online ISSN: 1999-6217-
dc.identifier.urihttp://103.69.126.140:8080/handle/20.500.14356/1698-
dc.descriptionOriginal Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: Magnetic resonance imaging is routinely done for diagnosis of lumbar disc prolapse. Many abnormalities of disc are observed even in asymptomatic patient.This study was conducted tocorrelate these abnormalities observed on Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical features of lumbar disc prolapse. Methods: A This prospective analytical study includes 57 cases of lumbar disc prolapse presenting to Department of Orthopedics, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital from March 2011 to August 2012. All patientshad Magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar spine and the findings regarding type, level and position of lumbar disc prolapse, any neural canal or foraminal compromise was recorded. These imaging findings were then correlated with clinical signs and symptoms. Chi-square test was used to find out p-value for correlation between clinical features and Magnetic resonance imaging findings using SPSS 17.0. Results: This study included 57 patients, with mean age 36.8 years. Of them 41(71.9%) patients had radicular leg pain along specific dermatome. Magnetic resonance imaging showed 104 lumbar disc prolapselevel. Disc prolapse at L4-L5 and L5-S1 level constituted 85.5%.Magnetic resonance imaging findings of neural foramina compromise and nerve root compression were fairly correlated withclinical findings of radicular pain and neurological deficit. Conclusions: Clinical features and Magnetic resonance imaging findings of lumbar discprolasehad faircorrelation, but all imaging abnormalities do not have a clinical significance. Keywords: Correlation; lumbar disc prolapse; magnetic resonance imaging.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNepal Health Research Councilen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMay-Aug, 2016;794-
dc.subjectCorrelationen_US
dc.subjectLumbar disc prolapseen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.titleCorrelation between Clinical Features and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Lumbar Disc Prolapseen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
local.journal.categoryOriginal Article-
Appears in Collections:Vol. 14 No. 2 Issue 33 May-Aug 2016

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
794-Article Text-1471-2-10-20170528.pdfFulltext Download175.94 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.