Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14356/1922
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaral, G-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-01T10:21:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-01T10:21:21Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationBaralG. (2012). An Assessment of the Safe Delivery Incentive Program at a Tertiary Level Hospital in Nepal. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v0i0.305en_US
dc.identifier.issnPrint ISSN: 1727-5482; Online ISSN: 1999-6217-
dc.identifier.urihttp://103.69.126.140:8080/handle/20.500.14356/1922-
dc.descriptionOriginal Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: Maternity incentive program of Nepal known as Safe Delivery Incentive Program (SDIP) was introduced nationwide in 2005 with the intention of increasing utilization of professional care at childbirth. The program provided both childbirth service as well as ‘cash’ to women giving birth in a health facility in addition to incentives to health provider for each delivery attended, either at home or the facility. Due to a lack of uniformity in its implementation and administrative delays, the program was reformed and even extended to many not-for-profit health institutions in early 2007, and implemented as a ‘Safer Mother Program’ popularly known as “Aama-Suraksha-Karyakram†since January 2009. Methods: This is a system research with observational and analytical components. Plausibility design is selected to evaluate the performance-based funding (PBF) as a system level intervention of maternity care using two instruments: Pay-For-Performance and Conditional-Cash-Transfer. It uses interrupted time-series to control for the natural trend. Research tools used are interviews, the focus group discussions and literature review. Numerical data are presented in simple graphs. While online random number generator was used partly, the purposive sampling was used for qualitative data. Results: There is a gross discrepancy in non-targeted service delivery at the tertiary level health facility. Overflooding of maternity cases has hampered gynecological admission and surgical management delaying subspecialty care and junior physicians’ training. With the same number and quality of physical facility and human resource, the additional program has put more strains to service providers and administrators. Conclusions: There should be adequate planning and preparation at all levels of health facilities; implementing a new program should not adversely affect another existing service delivery system. For the optional implementation, hospital organogram should be revised; and physical facilities and the low-risk birthing-centers with referral linkages should be expanded. Keywords: impact; incentive; maternity; safe-delivery; system researchen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNepal Health Research Councilen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMay-Aug, 2012;305-
dc.subjectImpacten_US
dc.subjectIncentiveen_US
dc.subjectMaternityen_US
dc.subjectSafe-deliveryen_US
dc.subjectSystem researchen_US
dc.titleAn Assessment of the Safe Delivery Incentive Program at a Tertiary Level Hospital in Nepalen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
local.journal.categoryOriginal Article-
Appears in Collections:Vol 10 No 2 Issue 21 May - Aug, 2012

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
305-Article Text-304-1-10-20130823.pdfFulltext Download1.01 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.