Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14356/1958
Title: Laparoscopic Primary repair of Common Bile Duct: Does the Suture Size Matter?
Authors: Joshi, M R
Sharma, S K
Citation: JoshiM. R., & SharmaS. K. (2011). Laparoscopic Primary repair of Common Bile Duct: Does the Suture Size Matter?. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v0i0.245
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: Nepal Health Research Council
Article Type: Original Article
Keywords: Bile
Choledocholithisis
Laparoscopiccholedocholithotomy
Suture
Series/Report no.: April;245
Abstract: Abstract Background: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary closure is being popular method of management for common bile duct stone. As the standard method of procedure is yet to be established, we have compared the outcome of using different size suture for the closure of choledochotomy wound. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted where patients were categorized in two groups. Those with 3-0 suture were grouped “A†and those with 5-0 in“Bâ€. Outcome regarding the suturing time, cost, postoperative bile leak and hospital stay were compared between two groups. Results: Total 42 cases were included, twenty-one in. Mean age in group A is 38.6yrs and in group B is 44.24yrs. The sex ratio is comparable. Mean time taken for suturing is almost same (34.4 mins Vs 32.6 mins). The Post-operative bile leak is significantly for shorter duration in 5-0 group than 3-0 group. But there is no difference in overall hospital stay. Conclusions: Post-operative bile leak is significantly less when common bile duct is sutured with thinner needle and suture. This does not increase the cost, does not prolong the operating time and is not associated with other complications. Although the overall hospital stay is same. Further large scale study is needed. Keywords: bile, choledocholithisis, laparoscopiccholedocholithotomy, suture
Description: Original Article
URI: http://103.69.126.140:8080/handle/20.500.14356/1958
ISSN: Print ISSN: 1727-5482; Online ISSN: 1999-6217
Appears in Collections:Vol 9 No 1 Issue 18 April 2011

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
245-Article Text-243-1-10-20130822.pdfFulltext Download272.72 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.